🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."