🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually bore the burden of her parent’s heritage. Being the child of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the most famous British musicians of the early 20th century, Avril’s name was shrouded in the lingering obscurity of the past.

The First Recording

Not long ago, I contemplated these shadows as I made arrangements to produce the world premiere recording of her concerto for piano composed in 1936. Featuring impassioned harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and valiant rhythms, Avril’s work will grant new listeners deep understanding into how the composer – a composer during war originating from the early 1900s – imagined her reality as a woman of colour.

Shadows and Truth

Yet about shadows. One needs patience to adapt, to perceive forms as they actually appear, to tell reality from misinterpretation, and I was reluctant to address her history for a while.

I earnestly desired the composer to be a reflection of her father. Partially, this was true. The pastoral English palettes of parental inspiration can be detected in many of her works, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to look at the titles of her family’s music to understand how he viewed himself as not only a standard-bearer of British Romantic style as well as a voice of the African diaspora.

It was here that Samuel and Avril began to differ.

White America assessed the composer by the brilliance of his art instead of the his racial background.

Samuel’s African Roots

While he was studying at the renowned institution, the composer – the offspring of a parent from Sierra Leone and a white English mother – began embracing his heritage. When the African American poet this literary figure came to London in that era, the young musician was keen to meet him. He adapted the poet’s African Romances to music and the following year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral piece that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an worldwide sensation, notably for Black Americans who felt indirect honor as American society assessed his work by the excellence of his music as opposed to the his race.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Fame did not temper Samuel’s politics. During that period, he participated in the pioneering African conference in England where he encountered the African American intellectual this influential figure and saw a range of talks, including on the oppression of the Black community there. He was a campaigner until the end. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders such as Du Bois and this leader, spoke publicly on ending discrimination, and even discussed matters of race with the American leader while visiting to the US capital in 1904. Regarding his compositions, reminisced Du Bois, “he wrote his name so notably as a musician that it will endure.” He passed away in that year, aged 37. Yet how might her father have reacted to his offspring’s move to be in the African nation in the 1950s?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Offspring of Renowned Musician expresses approval to S African Bias,” appeared as a heading in the community journal Jet magazine. This policy “seems to me the appropriate course”, the composer stated Jet. When pushed to clarify, she revised her statement: she didn’t agree with apartheid “as a concept” and it “ought to be permitted to work itself out, guided by good-intentioned people of diverse ethnicities”. Had Avril been more aligned to her parent’s beliefs, or raised in segregated America, she may have reconsidered about this system. Yet her life had sheltered her.

Background and Inexperience

“I possess a UK passport,” she remarked, “and the authorities did not inquire me about my ethnicity.” Thus, with her “fair” complexion (as Jet put it), she moved among the Europeans, buoyed up by their admiration for her late father. She gave a talk about her parent’s compositions at the University of Cape Town and conducted the national orchestra in Johannesburg, including the bold final section of her Piano Concerto, named: “In remembrance of my Father.” While a confident pianist personally, she avoided playing as the lead performer in her piece. Instead, she always led as the conductor; and so the orchestra of the era performed under her direction.

She desired, according to her, she “might bring a change”. Yet in the mid-1950s, circumstances deteriorated. Once officials became aware of her African heritage, she was forced to leave the land. Her British passport didn’t protect her, the UK representative recommended her departure or face arrest. She came home, embarrassed as the extent of her innocence became clear. “This experience was a difficult one,” she expressed. Increasing her embarrassment was the printing that year of her controversial discussion, a year after her sudden departure from the country.

A Familiar Story

As I sat with these memories, I felt a familiar story. The narrative of identifying as British until it’s revoked – one that calls to mind African-descended soldiers who defended the UK during the second world war and survived only to be refused rightful benefits. Along with the Windrush era,