🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish different wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their wards.